Where’s Elizabeth Warren’s Nobel Prize for Genetic Science?

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) deserves a Nobel Peace prize for science, following her recent DNA testing and results. Barack Obama was famously awarded a Nobel Prize for peace, not because he had done anything that led to peace, but simply because he was elected. Elizabeth Warren on the other hand has advanced the cause of science dramatically. The progressive scientific community has been assuring us for years now that race is a “social construct” – it is something you mentally perceive.

In other words, race is not actually something encountered in reality. Elizabeth Warren through her scientific pursuit of truth has shown the world that race is, in fact, so real that it can be determined down to a miniscule point.

Perhaps Elizabeth Warren’s campaign stunt, in which she revealed that she is – possibly – 1/1024th Native American, will allow us to have some intelligent discussions for once. We live in a peculiar time in world history in which the realities of racial differences are a topic so forbidden that they cannot be discussed intelligently. And yet, we’re talking about race all the time.

The problem is that discussing race, identity politics and differences across the human spectrum makes most people very uncomfortable. Shouldn’t we as Christians be able to discuss this like adults?

The affirmative action racket and those attempting to game the racial system to their personal benefit is in the news every day. Harvard University is under scrutiny and facing a lawsuit for its practice of mass exclusion of Asian students. Everyone has to tiptoe around discussing the case, because the implication of it is that Asians tend to be smarter than other races. Their over-achieving children would fill up most of the diversity slots at Harvard if they were not excluded.

This makes blacks and Hispanics terribly uncomfortable, so no one talks about the real issue. They simply call Harvard racist, when Harvard was ultimately trying to prevent itself from getting sued for perceived racism. The diversity racket became a lose-lose situation for the oldest university in America.

Elizabeth Warren called herself a “woman of color” at various times in her career and used her near-fable of Native American ancestry to game the system for herself. It appears that the blonde, blue-eyed Senator used claims of Indian heritage to obtain prestigious university jobs. She insists she is correct in her self-assessment, which turns out to be 1/1024th correct – even though most people think it’s weird that she would call herself that. If 1/1024 is enough to qualify for racial membership, then maybe race really does not exist.

On the other hand, the Cherokee Nation vehemently denies Elizabeth Warren’s claims to solidarity with them. Indian tribes now police their membership vigorously, ever since each tribe was allowed to form one casino back in the 1980s. This is why the Cherokee Nation kicked all 2,800 of its black members out in 2007.

Rich Cherokees owned black slaves back in the early 1800s and there was some intermixing at the time. Their descendants are clearly part Cherokee and part black. But because the monthly check from casino revenues is a finite number, the Cherokees kicked their black cousins out. So, Elizabeth Warren shouldn’t feel so bad that her 1/1024 heritage doesn’t qualify her for full membership.

If the scientific community fully submits to political correctness, genetic science will eventually have to be outlawed. Otherwise, the science is likely to confirm one of the central truths of the Bible. They’ll have to call it “eugenics” or something in order to get genetic science fully banned.

In all likelihood, genetic science will eventually confirm the truth of Genesis 1:27, “Male and female He created them,” because of the mathematical concept of “genetic collapse.” Here’s how that works. Think of your “family tree.” It’s shaped like a pyramid with you at the top.

If you assume approximately 25 years for each generation in your family tree, you would have had 1,024 ancestors in the 1700s. There’s that 1,024 number again! Because your number of ancestors doubles every generation (2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents and so on), you may have had approximately 1 million ancestors in the 1500s, 1 billion ancestors around 1250 and 1 trillion ancestors around the year 1,000.

This is just silly. The reality is that family trees are not an infinite pyramid, but rather a diamond shape. As we go further back in history, family trees genetically begin to shrink after a certain point as our ancestors pull double duty in slots on the family tree. Mathematics and logic dictate that ultimately, everyone’s family tree points back to an original mother and father – Adam and Eve. No one in the broader scientific community wants to admit this, but eventually they’ll either have to admit it or ban the science.

So, congratulations to Elizabeth Warren! We hope that her Nobel Prize in science is forthcoming because she has everyone talking about the biological reality of race. Now if we could just get the world to talk about it intelligently…

~ Christian Patriot Daily


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More